The importance of the few – how a minority of power users shape most of the discourse in CS forums

by | Jun 17, 2022 | Graphical article, Impact & Reach, Internal Content

  Reading Time: 3 minutes

Analysing the discourse in discussion forums of CS projects can help us to understand underlying patterns of collaborative knowledge creation and to identify highly engaged users. We ask the question: What can the quantitative analysis of forum data tell us about these patterns?

A minority of power users is responsible for most of the discourse.

Volunteers shape the discourse to a larger extent than anticipated.

We analysed the discussion data of the “Talk” pages of seven CS projects with similar forums on the Zooniverse platform. One point was to distinguish the share of different user groups in the discourse and in collaborative knowledge creation. In the discussion forums, users are assigned to different user roles, specifically volunteers, scientists, and moderators. They can also be promoted to higher roles, i.e., volunteers can become volunteer-moderators. In addition to examining which users make most of the comments, we also considered these specific user roles.

Figure 1.

The user roles are publicly indicated on the platform, and in total, volunteers are responsible for 75% of the comments, moderators for 23% and scientists for 2%. The moderator user group can be further broken down into moderators who were recruited from the volunteer group (49% of total cases), those who are also professional scientists  (6% of total cases), and those without any further specification (i.e., other moderators, 45% of total cases). In Fig. 1 we can see that the top 5% of users (arranged by individual comments made) across our seven analysed projects are responsible for 75% of the total comments. In other words, the majority of users only marginally influence discourse in the forums. On the right we can see the distribution of user roles among these top users. About 70% are volunteers (i.e., regular citizen scientists), whereas 30% are moderators. These top moderators are also roughly composed of equal parts other moderators and promoted moderators, with another 5% originally being scientists.

Graphic Legend 

The above figure shows a combination of multiple bar charts. The bar on the left shows the distribution of total comments across our seven analysed projects. In the middle, we see the top users, to the right the distribution of user roles among them and on the extreme right their composition.

Read more like this article

Help us disseminate our research results

Be the first to receive updates about CS Track project results, opinion pieces and News&Events related to Citizen Science.

Email Address
info@cstrack.eu
Twitter Account

Subscribe to our newsletter

Why we ask for profiles?

We ask for your profile for research purposes only. Filling in your profile does not imply to filtering the content you will receive.

I do not know which is my profile
  1. Policy-maker: Regional, national or international policy-maker or influencer.
  2. Academic: Academic engaged in research related to Citizen Science.
  3. Citizen Scientist: Citizen Scientist involved in or managing/planning one or more Citizen Science project.
  4. Organisational representative: member of a civil society organisation or NGO supporting Citizen Science (including science centres and musea, CS clubs and platforms etc.).
  5. Company representative: company employee supporting and/or funding Citizen Science projects or activities.
  6. Educator: Educator interested in supporting and promoting Citizen Science in an educational setting.
  7. Other.